Before We Begin
The questions that brought me here and the thread connecting everything that follows.
I almost didn’t start this. Not because I don’t have things to say, but because I have too many. Would I be opening Pandora’s box? Would my voice just be a drop in the ocean? Were my thoughts worthy of your time? For a long time, I told myself the internet didn’t need another person adding to the noise. I convinced myself those were good enough reasons not to dive in. They weren’t. They were stories I used to rationalize avoidance. Fear dressed as discernment.
So here I am.
I’ve spent my career working at the intersection of human behavior, leadership, and organizational change. I’ve sat with executives who can’t sleep, teams fracturing under pressure they can’t name, and founders navigating systems that were never designed for the speed they’re being asked to move at. I’ve written about imposter syndrome, the internal architecture of self-doubt, and I’ve watched that same doubt play out at organizational and societal levels in ways we don’t have good language for yet.
The thread running through all of it, always, is trust.
I’ve come to believe that trust operates at four distinct levels simultaneously.
There is the trust we have in ourselves, our judgment, our legitimacy, our right to take up space.
There is the trust between people, built slowly and lost quickly in the spaces between what we say and what we do.
There is the trust inside organizations, the invisible agreement that the system is worth showing up for.
And there is systemic trust, our collective faith in the institutions, technologies, and structures that hold society together.
These four levels are not separate. They cascade. When self-trust erodes, it surfaces in teams. When organizational trust fractures, people internalize it as personal failure. When systems move faster than people can adapt, self-doubt rushes in to fill the gap. The person sitting in a meeting wondering if they’re good enough and the enterprise quietly accumulating a trust deficit with every AI promise it can’t keep are experiencing different expressions of the same underlying breakdown.
That connection is what this newsletter is about.
Right now, trust is cracking in ways that aren’t being widely reported.
We are deploying technology before we understand its second-order consequences.
We are optimizing for speed to market over responsibility to people.
We are watching a generation of younger workers push back against a future they didn’t design and aren’t sure they want.
We are calling all of this progress. Some of it is. I’m not a pessimist and this isn’t a doom scroll. After all, I’m a tech founder and CEO. I’m in the middle of it.
But I’m also someone who has spent a long time paying attention to what lives beneath the surface of systems, in individuals, in organizations, in the broader culture. And right now, beneath the surface, something important is shifting. The signal is there, but it’s getting drowned out by noise we’re choosing not to question, because the inconvenient answers would upset markets that have already bet heavily on where we find ourselves today.
The people building this technology are largely talking to each other. The broader population experiencing it is not in that room. That gap is not a communication problem. It’s a trust problem.
Those are some of the questions I’m bringing here. This is where I think out loud.
The Future of Trust will go wherever trust takes us. Some weeks that’s artificial intelligence, the vulnerabilities nobody’s talking about, the adoption failures being misreported, the trust debt being quietly accumulated by an industry moving faster than it’s ready for. Some weeks it’s the internal landscape, imposter syndrome, the stories we tell ourselves about our own legitimacy, the ways self-doubt masquerades as humility. Some weeks it’s leadership, organizational change, or whatever is sitting in front of me that I can’t stop thinking about.
What it will always be is real. And never written to tell you what you want to hear.
If that sounds like something worth reading, I’m glad you’re here.


Sheryl, welcome to Substack. I’ve subscribed and look forward to reading more insights on trust as it relates to leadership and the constant changes we’re all dealing with. I like the granularity of the 4 levels of trust and the way they’re interconnected.
Well stated. The world and our relationships between ourselves - and now AI at some level - require a broad introspection and thought process. There will be discomfort, and wonder, in this new world. Your thoughts will add value to this journey we are all on.